LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
The ride is full of inaccuracies, which is to be expected. To name another: Michelangelo never painted the Sistine Ceiling on his back!
That one is a common misconception. I wonder if the original designers knew they were representing it wrong or thought that's how he painted it? I do enjoy the lighting and music in that scene!The ride is full of inaccuracies, which is to be expected. To name another: Michelangelo never painted the Sistine Ceiling on his back!
This is true though some creative license isn't necessarily a bad thing.The ride is full of inaccuracies, which is to be expected. To name another: Michelangelo never painted the Sistine Ceiling on his back!
I agree! It’s a theme-park ride, after all, not a textbook. I do wish the story it told were a bit less Eurocentric, though. China’s role in inventing paper and printing isn’t even mentioned.This is true though some creative license isn't necessarily a bad thing.
They probably knew, but it’s what people expect to see, so that’s the version they (understandably) went with. I really enjoy that scene too!That one is a common misconception. I wonder if the original designers knew they were representing it wrong or thought that's how he painted it? I do enjoy the lighting and music in that scene!
I recall that being taught in school...along with things like people thinking the world was flat before 1492...That one is a common misconception. I wonder if the original designers knew they were representing it wrong or thought that's how he painted it? I do enjoy the lighting and music in that scene!
That one is particularly strange given that we have ample evidence that most educated authors since antiquity realised the world was a sphere.I recall that being taught in school...along with things like people thinking the world was flat before 1492...
exactly.That one is particularly strange given that we have ample evidence that most educated authors since antiquity realised the world was a sphere.
I do agree though I don't know where a scene would fit. Also, it is an American created experience for both better and worse. China has never been our best friend and I think the only reason China has a pavillion in World Showcase was because it was designed in the 70s not long after Nixon's tour and trade agreements. The American Adventure is worse in the sense that there were people living here long before 1620. Heck they weren't even the first Europeans here and neither was Columbus. The Vikings had been on this land centuries before that.I agree! It’s a theme-park ride, after all, not a textbook. I do wish the story it told were a bit less Eurocentric, though. China’s role in inventing paper and printing isn’t even mentioned.
It really is a factor of does the staging work better for the attraction even if the historical accuracy is questionable.They probably knew, but it’s what people expect to see, so that’s the version they (understandably) went with. I really enjoy that scene too!
It could have come before the shift to medieval Europe, right after the Islamic scene.I do agree though I don't know where a scene would fit.
So we would be getting rid of the monks?It could have come before the shift to medieval Europe, right after the Islamic scene.
I'm not sure you interpreted me that way given that the monks count as medieval Europe.So we would be getting rid of the monks?
I understand but there really isn't much room to create a new scene. I am strongly of the opinion that the sculptor vignette in the renaissance scene should be replaced with a new vignette. Anyone who rode before 2007 knows that the statue has been modified to be family friendly and putting a new vignette there would distract from the obvious censorship job the statue got during the 07 refurb.I'm not sure you interpreted me that way given that the monks count as medieval Europe.
I was just musing about how the design could theoretically have been different.I understand but there really isn't much room to create a new scene.
I had to compare ride-throughs on YouTube to understand what you meant. Very interesting! Since I didn't remember the pre-2007 version, the current statue never struck me as being censored. To me, neither version looks especially good or true to the period, and that goes also for the still-life painting that appears seconds earlier in the same scene (still lifes weren't really a thing before the seventeenth century).I am strongly of the opinion that the sculptor vignette in the renaissance scene should be replaced with a new vignette. Anyone who rode before 2007 knows that the statue has been modified to be family friendly and putting a new vignette there would distract from the obvious censorship job the statue got during the 07 refurb.
Interesting. We run a small garden center and treat all plants in it, whether they come in as such or not, organically.Er, it is actually a bit out of date.
Releasing Ladybugs to control pests has largely fallen out of favor. The LwtL ride still promotes the idea as a solution to pest control.
There was a time when WDW used to release LOTS of lady bugs. Children were regularly invited to participate in ladybug releases at WDW. (2007ish)
I'm not an expert on gardening, but I am under the impression that the practice has now fallen out of favor. Introducing too many ladybugs can throw an ecosystem out of whack. One problem is the introduction of non-native species, another risk is accidentally introducing a disease/pathogen (to native populations), which then harms the native population. A third problem is that the introduced ladybugs often out-compete other beneficial native insect species, like lacewings. Lacewings also eat aphids. So again, having multiple beneficial species and supporting the natural ecosystem ends up being better for pest control ($) than throwing it out of whack.
The descent could be used for some storytelling although it wouldn't fit great after the space scene. Although I'm not sure that the story flow is great that we went to the moon and then invented the PC and then we go into space.Spaceship Earth is basically Intro to Western Civ, for better or worse, and is framed from an American perspective. It’s focused on the through line that created the United States as we know it today. That means most Asian History, African History, Native American History and European History post 1700s is glossed over. The ride is already 20 min long, you add them the ride more then doubles in length or it’s messaging becomes jumbled and un focused. There is only so much you can do.
I do agree though I don't know where a scene would fit. Also, it is an American created experience for both better and worse. China has never been our best friend and I think the only reason China has a pavillion in World Showcase was because it was designed in the 70s not long after Nixon's tour and trade agreements. The American Adventure is worse in the sense that there were people living here long before 1620. Heck they weren't even the first Europeans here and neither was Columbus. The Vikings had been on this land centuries before that.
The Chinese invention of paper is very much part of that story. (The relevance of Chinese printing technology is more debatable.)Spaceship Earth is basically Intro to Western Civ, for better or worse, and is framed from an American perspective.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.