Phroobar
Well-Known Member
Only if Inside Out is used to talk about mental health in an Edutainment way with an omnimover. Otherwise toons don't belong in Tomorrowland.
-
The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More -
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
New Tomorrowland @ Disneyland? Is this the year it finally gets announced? No, and that’s OK
- Thread starter mickEblu
- Start date
Disney Irish
Premium Member
Why are there no "toons" in your version of the future?
Last edited:
Agree, personally if they used Inside out to talk about mental health in the edutainment way and used F4 to talk about family relationships, and Wall-E to talk about nature and the importance of it would be my pitch.
Phroobar
Well-Known Member
It should be based on science not politics.
PizzaPlanet
Well-Known Member
I’ve said before that I could see them doing an Inside Out theater show to replace EO/ HISTA that could be cloned in DL and Epcot…
I don't think I mentioned politics and agree it should only science
Disney Irish
Premium Member
Unfortunately these days any topic (especially science) can be turned political by someone that disagrees with the message, even things that seem to be innocent in nature can get turned negative really quickly.
EPCOTCenterLover
Well-Known Member
^^^ I sadly agree with you, @Disney Irish. Unfortunately, almost any topics on these Boards (and others too), people can't politely agree to disagree. Because we are not "face to face", it seems to be open season for too many people to be rude and demeaning. It's a sad state of this world. What happened to kindness and respect?
Disney Irish
Premium Member
Its not just this board, its the world in general that we live right now.
So for example something that would seem obvious and usually agreed upon by almost all about an overall future with sustainable technology. However put that in a new Disney TL attraction and it can quickly get turned into an all out attack against Disney by groups that don't like that message, and said that Disney is pushing an agenda with their Parks. This I suspect is one of the reasons why Disney has yet to do something with TL, and why most plans include the use of IP that is deemed "safe" instead of original attractions.
Disney Irish
Premium Member
Disney Analyst
Well-Known Member
Ok, not a theory, but kinda a hope. I would be so happy if Monsters got delayed and they decide to put money and time into TL before Avatar pushing Avatar back. As I think TL and the new enterence/hub need to be the priority. I also still think Avatar would work best either in DL or a third park and still think that this project of Avatar in DCA will never happen (it's been 5 years)
BrianLo
Well-Known Member
I think it’s incredibly likely with how project timelines are settling there are significant 2029 projects for Disneyland and Epcot. We were just made prematurely aware of villains and Pandora for two different reasons.
As well developed as the near term pipeline is, if they are actually increasing spend to the point they say they are, we need to see more than what we got decade on decade. Even accounting for inflationary pressures. At WDW that means lapping Springs, Pandora, DAK broadly, DHS broadly, Skyliner, Galaxies Edge and wave one of Epcot, i don’t yet see us being ahead of that.
Likewise at Disneyland Galaxies Edge was a big ordeal, even if Avengers Campus was meh. The DCA pipeline doesn’t quite overtake that with MMRR in the mix and some spending wastage at DCA.
As well developed as the near term pipeline is, if they are actually increasing spend to the point they say they are, we need to see more than what we got decade on decade. Even accounting for inflationary pressures. At WDW that means lapping Springs, Pandora, DAK broadly, DHS broadly, Skyliner, Galaxies Edge and wave one of Epcot, i don’t yet see us being ahead of that.
Likewise at Disneyland Galaxies Edge was a big ordeal, even if Avengers Campus was meh. The DCA pipeline doesn’t quite overtake that with MMRR in the mix and some spending wastage at DCA.
I agree with the exception of Villains is definitely happening in some shape or form while Pandora I still think is questionable until ground is broken. But I definitely agree EPCOT and DL are gonna get heavy investments soon. Would also throw in AK and the Paris parks too for the parks that will get big expansions
BrianLo
Well-Known Member
Oh I’m not doubting either project is happening. Josh has cancelled absolutely nothing yet in his tenure and that includes weird one-off items that another park exec would typically pretend were never mentioned.
I think what has changed is my interpretation of their timelines. Villains seems to have shifted a bit and the Eastern Gateway just didn’t get off the ground expediently enough. Though they knew this a while ago, I don’t think they had a clear eastern gateway timeframe when Pandora first was slotted into the backlot a few years ago.
This Pandora project is a signature project with really strong buisness arguments to carry it through. They’ve just reaffirmed it again.
TP2000
Well-Known Member
Welp.... it's the Spring of 2026 now. When does the rehab start? Where's the electric Autopia?
