• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

MK Big Thunder Mountain to receive full retrack

𝐌𝖆𝖓 𝖎𝖓 𝐖𝖊𝖇

Long-Forgotten
Premium Member
Given the on-going refresh of Big Thunder Mountain, I wonder if there's any gas left in the tank for some needed "quality of life" improvements for The Barnstormer? While it’s a solid starter coaster, it remains a pretty boring entry in the Disney catalog, even after the Storybook conversion.

For starters, losing the intimidating chain-dog clacking lift would be a huge first step in making the ride less scary for kiddos (the target audience). Implementing speakers around the track to trigger Goofy’s narration and sputtering plane sound effects would also improve the experience. I mean, where's the iconic "AAAH HOO HOO HOO HOOEY!"? Repainting the "plywood Billboards" on both sides so the "crash gag" is actually visually easier to comprehend would be an easy win as well. Installing a static or limited-motion figure of Giggles the Chimp (Goofy's airplane mechanic, I guess? Who knew?) and adding a queue pre-show in that classic "Goofy’s How-To" animation style.... Disney could finally establish a clear "stunt show" backstory.

It’s an okay coaster as it stands, but a story-based refresh would truly take it to the next level. If Big Thunder can get a refresh (without an IP no less!) then surely "The Great Goofini" is deserving of an upgrade. Rant over. Looking forward to seeing the Big Thunder effects upgrade. I suspect, it will have a clearer story now.
 
Last edited:

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
And this was unfortunately one of the many things that set that wonderful park up for failure. It’s a beauty to behold, but man the consequences were sharp.
This is just laughable. The park largely performed well and as expected. The design of the park had nothing to do with overbuilding the larger resort or prematurely building a weak second gate instead of renegotiating the land deals.
 

Mr. Sullivan

Well-Known Member
The park largely performed well and as expected.
Even Disney themselves acknowledges this is not true. The park, and indeed the resort as a whole, fell well short of Disney’s hopes and expectations and while not the sole reason for the disaster the company became for fifteen years after was one of the major dominos that started that process.

There’s been countless books and documentaries, both unofficial and from Disney themselves, that have gone deep into the initial failure of Euro Disney that took years to recover from.

DLP is a gorgeous park but it was indeed a huge failure when it opened. The whole project was.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Even Disney themselves acknowledges this is not true. The park, and indeed the resort as a whole, fell well short of Disney’s hopes and expectations and while not the sole reason for the disaster the company became for fifteen years after was one of the major dominos that started that process.

There’s been countless books and documentaries, both unofficial and from Disney themselves, that have gone deep into the initial failure of Euro Disney that took years to recover from.

DLP is a gorgeous park but it was indeed a huge failure when it opened. The whole project was.
It was like three years, and it was the resort as a whole more than the park. Visitation was fine which is why they pushed the capacity improvement program. The resort was profitable for the second half of the 90s following the opening of Space Mountain: De la Terra à la Lune.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Paris is the ultimate gold standard of course when it comes to framing what you see from each land and each area.

And this was unfortunately one of the many things that set that wonderful park up for failure.

Huh? Framing what you see from each land set the park up for “failure” (by definition DLP is not a failure, since ya know…. You can still visit it.)
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
Given the on-going refresh of Big Thunder Mountain, I wonder if there's any gas left in the tank for some needed "quality of life" improvements for The Barnstormer? While it’s a solid starter coaster, it remains a pretty boring entry in the Disney catalog, even after the Storybook conversion.

For starters, losing the intimidating chain-dog clacking lift would be a huge first step in making the ride less scary for kiddos (the target audience). Implementing speakers around the track to trigger Goofy’s narration and sputtering plane sound effects would also improve the experience. I mean, where's the iconic "AAAH HOO HOO HOO HOOEY!"? Repainting the "plywood Billboards" on both sides so the "crash gag" is actually visually easier to comprehend would be an easy win as well. Installing a static or limited-motion figure of Giggles the Chimp (Goofy's airplane mechanic, I guess? Who knew?) and adding a queue pre-show in that classic "Goofy’s How-To" animation style, Disney could finally establish a clear "stunt show" backstory.

It’s an okay coaster as it stands, but a step up in the story-based refresh would truly take it to the next level. If Big Thunder can get a refresh (without an IP no less), then surely The Great Goofini is deserving of an upgrade. Rant over. Looking forward to seeing the Big Thunder effects upgrade. I suspect, it will have a clearer story now.
I do like the idea though I have to admit another re-theme might be necessary considering not long after the Storybook Circus opened, the actual circus went out of business. So, the cultural significance and overall concept of the circus will likely be lost to future generations or at least looked back on in a negative light.
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
Compared to….. old west gold mines?
Let's just say the "Old West" angle that had been the hallmark of Frontierland for over fifty years that is clearly on its way out with everything other than BTM is not a surprise to me. As I said BTM itself will look oddly out of place in the near future.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I do like the idea though I have to admit another re-theme might be necessary considering not long after the Storybook Circus opened, the actual circus went out of business. So, the cultural significance and overall concept of the circus will likely be lost to future generations or at least looked back on in a negative light.
How could the actual circus go out of business when it wasn’t one business? I’m assuming you’re referring to Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey which Feld Entertainment has revived. Storybook Circus is also very much rooted in the massive train-based circuses that ended decades before the land opened.
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
How could the actual circus go out of business when it wasn’t one business? I’m assuming you’re referring to Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey which Feld Entertainment has revived. Storybook Circus is also very much rooted in the massive train-based circuses that ended decades before the land opened.
Let's not pretend that Ringling was not to the Circus business what Disney is to the Theme Park business and yes, it was eventually revived but only after a major legal and PR fiasco and several years of inactivity. Plus, Feld himself admitted that a major part of that was that live entertainment wasn't exactly thriving in the digital age besides the obvious reason.
 
Last edited:

AidenRodriguez731

Well-Known Member
Let's not pretend that Ringling was not to the Circus business what Disney is to the Theme Park business and yes, it was eventually revived but only after a major legal and PR fiasco and several years of inactivity. Plus, Feld himself admitted that a major part of that was that live entertainment wasn't exactly thriving in the digital age besides the obvious reason.
Sure but if Disney went out of business you wouldn't just close down everything that references theme parks and say "oop, theme parks went out of business, let's close up shop!"

Even then, I feel like the circus is one of those nostalgic times, it's fantasyland anyway, it doesn't currently have to exist to still fit the land (just like how you don't have bustling medieval villages with castles still guarding them)
 

Mr. Sullivan

Well-Known Member
Huh? Framing what you see from each land set the park up for “failure” (by definition DLP is not a failure, since ya know…. You can still visit it.)
The money they sunk into that extra detail that makes the park so beautiful and unique is part of what put the resort in such a precarious place when it initially floundered so hard is what I meant. It was a double edged sword. They invested the time and money to go that extra mile and it in the end turned into a problem for them, which is perhaps part of the reason why they’ve not done something that ornate for a castle park since.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
I thought the original problem with the EuroDisney resort was the overbuilding of the hotels for the crowds that mostly day-trip... that is what I understood at the time... The park was doing fine, maybe not their anticipated crowd levels, but the problem was the multiple fully staffed resort hotels.....
 

gerarar

Premium Member
1776103161878.jpeg


Source and more:
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom