• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Do you think Shanghai will go for another expansion next or go for a second gate?

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
We were sat having coffee and cake as you do outside of Cookie Ann down the side street. One of the furry creatures was walking past. I can only describe being followed by Beatlemania.

Ah yes, I took a picture of that too :p

Pan around the crowd to see the various stuffies being held up in the air.

IMG_8040.jpeg
 

GravityFalls

Active Member
I read the article. This is the exact paragraph, I don't think there is a source other than Jim Shull. It all reads like speculation to me.

On the theme park side of things, Shull floated the possibility that the “Avatar” attraction planned for Disney California Adventure could still be used elsewhere. There’s an expansion pad, tentatively marked for a future attraction, show or additional retail or dining, tucked behind the current “Avatar”-themed land at Disney’s Animal Kingdom. And it could be used in a future overseas park – Shanghai’s second gate, dubbed Project Atlas, is in the planning stages and has seen an overhaul from an EPCOT-of-the-east-type science and technology park to something centered on Disney “adventures,” like “Avatar.” There is also talk that the third Tokyo gate, DisneySky, is back on the drawing board. And wouldn’t the floating mountains of Pandora fit perfectly with that theme?
 

Nickm2022

Well-Known Member
I was gonna say I really really doubt they have gone from 10+ years of an EPCOT inspired idea to saying let's do Paris's Adventure World. I really doubt that. also it's Jim.
 

GimpYancIent

Well-Known Member
The homogenization of Disney Parks continues.
In the case of Shanghi it is not a Disney park. It is a Chinese amusement venue for which Disney is compensated for use of its trademarks and intellectual properties. Disney is a minority shareholder. The entire project was and is intended to be Chinese with Disney flavoring.
 

denyuntilcaught

Well-Known Member
In the case of Shanghi it is not a Disney park. It is a Chinese amusement venue for which Disney is compensated for use of its trademarks and intellectual properties. Disney is a minority shareholder. The entire project was and is intended to be Chinese with Disney flavoring.
As is Tokyo but they've somehow avoided - for the most part - the plug-and-play approach to design that has now created this sense of "everything is now the same" that's very palpable these days.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
The homogenization of Disney Parks continues.

Beyond that nothing really seems to have changed - wouldn’t another Epcot be the very definition of homogenization?

That’s largely the complaint of Tokyo Disneyland, that it really was just a plug and play magic kingdom / Disneyland.

Of course it could simply be another ring-around-an-IP lake. But what’s the meaningful difference in the conceptual stage when we talk about DisneySea. Are we getting a broader thematic weave here or are we just getting Frozen Land and Cars land etc. Or could we possibly see a mixture of both as Shanghai Disneyland and Tokyo Disney Sea gave us in principle?
 

Rush

Well-Known Member
Is this news? The castle parks have been copying the original since the beginning. The most unique take was Shanghai and it got criticized for not doing things like a true castle park. Disney will get criticized regardless.

I think Disneyland Abu Dhabi will break the mold with a different take on a castle park. So much has changed since Shanghai was being drawn up in the 2000's and early 10's.
 

denyuntilcaught

Well-Known Member
Is this news? The castle parks have been copying the original since the beginning. The most unique take was Shanghai and it got criticized for not doing things like a true castle park. Disney will get criticized regardless.
There's much nuance to the discussion about the difference between variations of castle parks versus plug-and-play IP or, as BrianIP perfectly put it, ring-around-an-IP lake, creating a sense of sameness in the parks that didn't exist up until Iger.
 

Pizza Moon

Well-Known Member
I could see an indoor Avatarland in Abu Dhabi
They’d probably actually have the foot print lights.

People are sleeping on that project, and what’s nice is zero dollars comes from Disney, just incredible amounts of free R&D.

I’m really hoping we get a major Aladdin ride there and a major Mulan ride at Shanghai’s second gate!
 

Pizza Moon

Well-Known Member
Nope, just the truth.
It literally is a Disney park first and foremost designed by Walt Disney Imagineers, and its management is majority-controlled by Disney.

If you are just saying on paper semantically like OLC is a “Japanese amusement venue” then sure, then I apologize as I’m I’m misinterpreting your angle, but if you’re trying to minimize what Shanghai Disneyland is, then well you’re very wrong.

It feels more Disney than Animal Kingdom does, and the scale of its theming in many areas feels much more expansive and ambitious.

Have you even been?

If Battle for the Sunken Treasure is the product of just a “Chinese amusement venue” then sign me up!

I hope Shendi group buys TWDC! Maybe they’d put TRON at MK since it’s better than the Little Mermaid ride if they bought it at some point!
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom