Recent content by mickEblu

It’s not a drawn out walkway. You go under that rock work and you are in now in Cars Land. The aesthetic completely changes instantly. That’s a portal

The San Fran to Cars Land transition is essentially a portal and San Fransokyo is indeed a land.

I think the reason some people have a hard time visualizing it is because of the stark contrast between Pandora and Hollywood blvd as well as the scale of that rock work. At Disneyland the one land with Pandora scale is hidden behind the berm and all of those lands sort of senselessly blend into...

Let’s not get hung up on semantics. The “spaces” headliner. Does that work better? It’s still going to be a land. Disney just didn’t want to set the expectations of it being some huge thing in the era of huge 14 acre lands. I disagree I think Avatar will be a true E and Coco will be a D.

Not sure. I mean they did bring out Rey. I’ve seen a couple good Reys though. Maybe it helps that she’s not as iconic?

This doesn’t work for me. That awful look alike standing next to Chewy doesn’t help me buy in more. It does quite the opposite.

This is the headliner of the land though. NRJ is a secondary attraction. This concept art clearly shows bigger scope/ scale which would make sense as the lands headliner.

But the Avatar show building would be much larger I assume.

lol my dude you are really low on Disney/ WDI right now. I get it. Ive been there. I’m still there haha. But I have to assume the end product will be something that resembles the concept art and not something competent different. I’m not expecting a treehouse restaurant but something like that...

Speaking of the restaurant at Pandora I really hope they don’t phone it in like they did with Docking Bay at GE. There are so many cool opportunities. Give us some treehouse restaurant or something.

So why do we think they haven’t filed a permit to demo Stage 12 or stage 17? Seems like they may repurpose/ retheme stage 12 to be an eatery but why wouldn’t stage 17 be knocked down? Maybe it’s still coming.

Tell me you re not a Star Wars fan without telling you’re not a Star Wars fan.

I’ve long called it a grand entrance to the ride. Makes the most sense when you consider the concept art + their insistence on calling it an experience.

Perhaps I should define what I mean by NRJ 3.0: - simple boat ride system - no Shanghai POTC ride system - The above means likely no dynamic scenes like rising above or below water - larger scope/ scale - at least 3-4 x bigger than NRJ - AAs - at least 10-15 including some large creatures...

Again context. The movie just came out and made two billion . Let’s see if it’s still more popular in 10 years. I’m calling it Navi River Journey 3.0 which think is a very realistic outlook and closer to reality than you saying they re going to flat out deliver a completely different ride than...